After 40 years of organized rallies and events raising awareness and promoting environmental advocacy, I think it is fair to ask the question "to what end?" Where are we now compared to the first passionate rallies shook the nation? As Senator John Kerry prepares to unveil a new bi-partisan direction for US energy legislation, and the United States jockeys to control international climate negotiations, where exactly are we headed?
In this great interview of ecologist David Orr, he speaks about some of the lost thunder from those inspired days:
The one thing that was missing in that dialogue in the Seventies and Eighties was that nobody was really talking about strategy. How do we convey this as a message? We made the assumption, at least I sure did, that all people needed were the facts, data and logic. That meant more articles, more books, and then pretty soon they’ll see what’s at stake. I think we missed the whole issue of how you motivate people and how you actually move the dialogue. I don’t know that even if we had tried to do that, I don’t know that we could have done. I know that I went to meetings in the Seventies and Eighties, talking about the politics of these things and I don’t think people got how important the political dimension was, even at the local scale, the national or global scale, I don’t think people were understanding it.
I think the past 40 years have proven the inability of the environmental movement to gain traction on protecting planet Earth and her inhabitants. And I think that in order to make a serious dent in staving off the worst of the environmental crises that we now confront, we need to start a new conversation. Let us not make the same strategic failures of the past 4 decades. Let's learn from our mistakes and figure out what it takes to build an effective movement to reverse course before it's too late.
Please join the conversation by entertaining some of the following questions. What is your sense of the successes and failures of environmental advocacy of the past 40 years? What's been missing from the strategy and how do we best change course? How do we reframe the conversation and shift the debate so that it is grounded in reality and possibility? How do we organize ourselves in our communities and across the Commonwealth, the nation, and the globe, to have a voice in the debate about the survival of our species? How do we bridge the gaps that keep us divided? What are realistic goals for US climate legislation and the UN climate negotiations in Cancun this December? What are realistic goals 3-5 years out? 10 years out? How do we change the political realities so that they are up to the task of confronting the daunting ecological realities of our time?
Comments
Earth Day co-opted by corporations
Like so many other good things, Earth Day has also been co-opted by the greed and power of corporations, into an occasion full of commercial possibilities, on top of providing a nice greenwash for all the worst polluters of the world.
This has been done with the HELP of big, "mainstream" environmental organizations who, by the way, never fail to use every opportunity to advertise themselves as "the voice of the environmental movement". They have sold out to corporations, pushed by a strong ideology of market fundamentalism that gradually took over the organizations from their original founders. They have become effective tools and mouthpieces and provided green cover for these corporations in their practice of what Canadian author Naomi Klein termed "disaster capitalism".
Here is a new article on Common Dreams: Mainstream Green Groups Cave In on Climate, Dangerously Allow Industry to Set Agenda
More on Greenwashers and Co-opted “Greens” here: http://www.climatesos.org/resources/ (last section)
We need to take political action against the disease of profit driving everything. We also need to stop supporting, and start exposing these "off-greens". They have to either change their policies and behavior, or step aside.
Post new comment